
Hunter Myers | September 9, 2025
Welcome to the LHAC Power Index Week 3 Rankings. Last week the model suffered one of its worst weeks in its 2 years of testing (it was bound to happen at some point). The model went 7-3, missing the mark on Johnstown, Penn Cambria, and Bellwood-Antis.
This seems like a good time to explain how the model deals with adjustments, since there’s bound to be some controversy. Essentially, the model learns a little more about each team, each week. As we progress through the season, the model will start to dial in how it has the teams ranked, as it (in theory) becomes more accurate each week.
However, one thing to note is that the model will have teams that lose to other teams remain higher than them (i.e.: Penn Cambria and Forest Hills). This is because the model learns, it does not overreact to one week. Football is a game played between the lines, and data can only go so far. According to the data, if Penn Cambria and Forest Hills played a series of games, Penn Cambria would win about 77% of those games. Therefore, the model does not see itself as being wrong; it just sees the result as improbable.
Anyways, shall we see the Power Rankings:
| Rank | Trend | Team | ELO | Previous Rank |
| 1 | 0 | Richland | 1815 | 1 |
| 2 | 0 | McCort | 1733 | 2 |
| 3 | 1 | Bishop Guilfoyle | 1678 | 4 |
| 4 | -1 | Penn Cambria | 1659 | 3 |
| 5 | 1 | Clearfield | 1569 | 6 |
| 6 | 2 | Forest Hills | 1550 | 8 |
| 7 | -2 | Bellwood-Antis | 1546 | 5 |
| 8 | -1 | Philipsburg | 1524 | 7 |
| 9 | 1 | Bald Eagle | 1503 | 10 |
| 10 | 2 | Huntingdon | 1495 | 12 |
| 11 | -2 | Bellefonte | 1493 | 9 |
| 12 | -1 | Tyrone | 1480 | 11 |
| 13 | 1 | Bedford | 1452 | 14 |
| 14 | -1 | Central | 1423 | 13 |
| 15 | 0 | Chestnut Ridge | 1417 | 15 |
| 16 | 0 | Somerset | 1406 | 16 |
| 17 | 0 | Central Cambria | 1363 | 17 |
| 18 | 0 | Westmont | 1349 | 18 |
| 19 | 0 | Johnstown | 1276 | 19 |
| 20 | 0 | Penns Valley | 1269 | 20 |
Week 2 Takeaways:
Check back tomorrow for some Week 4 Predictions, the season is just heating up.